The price map
What co-parenting apps actually cost in 2026
Co-parenting apps have changed price faster than the advice about them has changed. Two of the three apps that almost every roundup recommends as the free options are not free any more: TalkingParents closed its free tier on 30 March 2026, and AppClose now runs $7.99 a month on the web. Anything written before spring 2026, including the earlier version of this page, is telling you something that stopped being true. So here is the honest starting point, checked against each vendor’s own pricing page in September 2026 rather than against last year’s reviews.
| App | Best for | What it costs (September 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| OurFamilyWizard | High-conflict and court-involved cases; the recognised standard | Per parent, $110 to $300 a year |
| TalkingParents | Court-admissible, unalterable communication records | Per parent, from $7 a month; no free tier since March 2026 |
| AppClose | Everyday calendar, messaging, and expense requests | $7.99 a month on web, $8.99 in-app; 60-day trial |
| 2houses | One organised hub for both households | $99 a year, covering the whole family |
| Cozi | Amicable co-parents who only share a calendar | Free with ads; Cozi Gold costs $39 to remove them |
| A shared spreadsheet | Owning your records, no subscription | Free, or a one-off |
Read that table by column two, not column three. Most co-parenting apps do the same three jobs, a shared calendar, a message thread, and an expense list, so the cheapest one that does not do the job you need is not a saving, and the expensive one you do need is rarely the place to economise. What has changed this year is that price is no longer a tiebreaker you can ignore, because the free tier that used to absorb the undecided is gone.
The court-grade apps
OurFamilyWizard and TalkingParents: paying for the record
Of the co-parenting apps built for contested cases, OurFamilyWizard is the one most courts and family lawyers know by name, and for a high-conflict split it remains the safe default. It puts the calendar, messaging, expenses, and an information bank in one place, and the real product is the record: messages are timestamped and unalterable, payments are logged, and the history exports cleanly for a lawyer or a judge. It is billed per parent, from $110 a year at the entry tier up to roughly $300 for the top plan, and each parent needs their own subscription. That is the number people miss. A two-home arrangement is $220 to $600 a year, not $110, unless one parent pays for both.
TalkingParents competes on the same ground and is the other name attorneys tend to recognise. It starts at $7 a month per parent, with $16 and $32 tiers above it, and annual billing saves about 8 percent. Since 30 March 2026 there is no free tier at all, which is the single biggest change in this category and the reason a lot of parents are re-choosing right now. There is a 30-day trial, and fee waivers for financial hardship and for domestic violence cases, which are worth applying for rather than assuming you do not qualify.
If you are choosing between the two on the strength of an older comparison, one distinction has quietly collapsed: tone-checking no longer separates them. OurFamilyWizard’s Writing Assistant sits on its Essentials tier and above, and TalkingParents added Sentiment Scanner and Writing Assist on its top tier, so both will now flag or rewrite a heated message before it is sent. Call recording is the other thing worth reading carefully, because on TalkingParents it is metered rather than included: 30 minutes a month at the entry tier, 60 in the middle, and uncapped only on the $32 plan.
The everyday apps
AppClose and 2houses: the everyday hubs
AppClose spent years as the standard answer to “is there a free co-parenting app”, and it is the change most likely to catch you out. It now costs $7.99 a month on the web, or $8.99 if you subscribe through the app stores. The product itself is unchanged and still good at the everyday job: messaging, a shared calendar, and expense and reimbursement requests, without the court-grade weight of the other two. Two things soften the news. The trial runs 60 days with no card upfront, which is long enough to actually know, and the company says it has given more than 25,600 free accounts since 1 January 2026 to parents in financial hardship and to domestic violence survivors, and it discounts subscriptions for military families (checked September 2026). The paywall is real, but it is not absolute if your situation is hard.
2houses deserves a second look now that price is doing the deciding, because it is the only one of these co-parenting apps that does not bill per parent. One subscription at $99 a year covers both households, the children, and any third parties you add, and only one parent has to pay it. Set against OurFamilyWizard’s $220 to $600 for two homes, that is a different order of cost for a tool that covers the same everyday ground: calendar, expenses, an information bank, and a journal. It gives you no court-admissible record, so it is not a substitute where documentation is the point. The trial is a short 14 days. The question is no longer which co-parenting app is free, but what you are paying for and whether you need it.
The question is no longer which co-parenting app is free, but what you are paying for and whether you need it.On choosing one in 2026
Still free
Is any co-parenting app still free?
One, with an asterisk. Cozi is still free, supported by ads, with a Cozi Gold tier at $39 that removes them and adds a month view and reminders. But it is a family organiser, not a co-parenting app: there are no separate-household features, no expense splitting between two homes, and no record worth the name. For two parents who genuinely only need to see the same calendar, that is enough, and it costs nothing. For anything past that, calling it a co-parenting app oversells it.
The more useful answers to the free question are the ones nobody puts in a comparison table of co-parenting apps. The fee-waiver programs at TalkingParents and AppClose are real, they cover financial hardship and domestic violence situations, and AppClose’s own numbers say tens of thousands of parents are on them. The trials are long enough to be worth sequencing rather than wasting: 60 days at AppClose, 30 at TalkingParents, 14 at 2houses. And if what you need is the schedule and the money rather than an admissible record, the free option was never really an app.
No subscription
The no-subscription alternative: a shared spreadsheet

For amicable co-parents, the honest answer is that you may not need one of these co-parenting apps at all. The two things separated parents actually share, the schedule and the money, are exactly what a spreadsheet is good at: a calendar tab for who has the children when, an expense tab that adds up and splits the shared costs, and a dated log for anything worth recording. It lives in your own drive, needs no monthly fee, and stays yours rather than a company’s. It will not give you a tamper-evident message record, so it is the wrong tool for a contested case. For two parents who can communicate civilly, it covers the everyday job for nothing. Our co-parenting spreadsheet guide lays out the structure, the custody schedule template covers the calendar side, the expense tracker handles the splitting, and the communication log gives you a dated record if you ever need one.
That set is what we built the Templacity Co-Parent Tracker around: the schedule, the expenses, and a communication record in one workbook both homes can update, with no monthly fee and nothing to lose access to. It pairs with a written parenting plan for the rules behind the schedule, and with a 50/50 custody schedule if that is the pattern you are running. The plan sets out how you co-parent; the tracker is where it gets lived out, week to week. Given what happened to the free tiers this year, the case for owning that record rather than renting it is stronger than it was when we first wrote this page.
Which to use
Which co-parenting app should you use
Choose between co-parenting apps by conflict level first, then by billing structure. If your split is high-conflict or a court is involved, use OurFamilyWizard or TalkingParents and treat the subscription as part of the cost of protecting yourself and your child; budget for two subscriptions, and apply for a waiver if the money is genuinely hard. If you get along well enough but want one organised hub, 2houses is now the better-value pick at $99 a year for the family, with AppClose worth its 60-day trial if the interface suits you better. If all you truly share is a calendar, Cozi does that for free. And if you want the schedule, the expenses, and a record without a subscription, a shared spreadsheet still does the everyday job and keeps your data in your own hands. The most common mistake has not changed: paying for court-grade software you will never need, or trusting memory when you needed a record. Match the tool to the temperature of the relationship, and revisit it when that changes. None of this is legal advice, and where a court has told you to communicate a particular way, that instruction wins over anything here.
If one of these co-parenting apps moved you off a free tier this year and you had to re-choose, tell us what you landed on in the comments, and whether the paid version turned out to be worth it. The honest experience of parents who have lived it helps the next person choose better than any feature list can.
FAQ
Common questions, answered briefly
What is the best co-parenting app?
Is there a free co-parenting app?
How much do co-parenting apps cost?
What is the difference between OurFamilyWizard and TalkingParents?
Are co-parenting app messages admissible in court?
Can a spreadsheet replace a co-parenting app?
If yours isn’t above, drop the question in the comments and we’ll add it.
People also ask